Vol. 79 No: 4

Title:
Effects of different ground vegetation management systems on soil quality, growth and fruit quality of culinary apple trees

Authors:
DAVID L. EHRET, FANNY VANEL, PAT BOWEN, TOM HELMER, BRENDA FREY and KEVIN USHER

pp: 619-626

Abstract:
The yield and quality of pineapple sage (Salvia elegans Vahl.) grown in two substrates (sawdust and rockwool) and at two nutrient solution concentrations (electrical conductivities of 1.7 and 4 mS cm^-1) were compared in each of two years. No consistent effects of substrate were observed on any of the parameters measured, including plant fresh mass, dry mass, leaf area, chlorophyll content or shelf life. Leaf/stem fresh and dry mass ratios were also largely unaffected by substrate. Electrical conductivity (EC), however, had significant effects on most of these parameters. High EC reduced plant size, with lower plant fresh and dry mass, leaf number and leaf area. However, plant quality was improved as demonstrated by increased leaf/stem fresh mass ratio. In addition, chlorophyll concentrations were higher in high ECtreated plants, and shelf life was improved as shown by a reduction in percent water loss in cold storage. Load cells placed beneath the plants were used to monitor and compare transpiration and 24 h growth of high and low EC-treated plants grown in rockwool over a 90 d period. Daily growth recorded between 2400 and 0200 hours was found to be higher in the low EC-treated plants, supporting the observation of greater harvested fresh mass for those plants. Daily transpiration was found to be higher in the low EC plants, due mostly to their greater leaf area compared with high EC plants.When transpiration was compared on a leaf-area basis, no consistent differences were observed between EC treatments. Adapting the principles of a water-balance lysimeter, load cells were also found to be a useful means to check for relative moisture content of the substrate. Since transpiration and water replenishment (supply minus leachate) could be recorded independently, comparison of the two indicates an increase (replenishment > transpiration), decrease (replenishment < transpiration) or no change (replenishment = transpiration) in water content.

Full text: JHSB Subscribers     ISHS members & other users
(PDF 459662 bytes)

Translate:

Go back to previous page